The Western “Math-Gangsters” and the Kosovization of Macedonia

Share

Hits: 718

Introduction

After the referendum’s results held in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on September 30th this year and the Western reactions on it (by the EU & NATO) it is absolutely clear that this small Balkan country is finally proven to be the Western puppet colony without its own real Government and above all the national sovereignty. To remind ourselves, the people of Macedonia were called to express their wish to change or not a state’s name into the Northern Macedonia and, therefore, its national name into the Northern Macedonians, in order to avoid further obstructions by neighboring Greece in the country’s accession to both the NATO and the EU. The deal on a new state’s and the national name was reached earlier this year by Macedonia’s and Greece’s PMs under the umbrella of Brussels but according to the Constitution, it has to be approved by the nation. Nevertheless, only Macedonia’s citizens went to the ballot boxes but not and their Greek counterparts. Of course, as in any even quasi-democratic political system, the success of the referendum requires an electoral-body’s activity of a minimum 50% plus one voter. However, a Macedonian voting activity counted only 36% of the active voters among whom 95% voted “Yes” that means two fundamental conclusions: 1) The referendum failed to be counted as a valid; and 2) The 2/3 of Macedonia’s voting body, de facto, told “No” to the deal with Greece.

A Greater Albania today

Nonetheless, the Western “liberal democracies” of the NATO’s and EU’s Governmental structures immediately after the referendum’s results became known expressed their deep and sincere thanks to the Macedonian people for the support of Macedonia’s way to those two Western organizations. Simply, according to their democratic miracle-arithmetic, 1/3 (of voters) is higher than 2/3 (of voters)! But such political mathematics is quite understandable if we know that Macedonia simply has to become the NATO/EU’s member state by all means – regular or not no matter. On this place we have to keep in mind three crucial facts: 1) Macedonia, together with a neighboring Kosovo, has the focal geopolitical position at the Balkans; 2) The whole region is left to be an exclusive Western (the EU/NATO/USA) colonial territory or a “sphere of interest” since 2003 when the Russian peacekeepers left the region; and ) Macedonia is even from 1991 under a direct protectorate by the NATO troops just in the formal form of the UN protection forces. But at the same time, the question is what the Western “math-gangsters” are going to do in order to force 2/3 of Macedonia’s population to accept a name-deal with Greece? The answer is simple, workable, productive and already implemented two decades ago in the case of neighboring Serbia – the Kosovization of Macedonia. In other words, the Western “math-gangsters” will re-activate in a pure form a Kosovo syndrome in Macedonia in order to necessitate “Russian agents” to accept the name-deal for the sake of NATO/EU’s membership. The same happened with Serbia in 1998−1999: when Slobodan Miloshevic rejected the American ultimatum to transform Serbia into the Western political, financial, economic and military colony, immediately Kosovo’s Albanians were activated and the war with Serbia’s state’s authorities started. The end of Kosovization of Serbia is already well known.

An Albanian factor

What is really missing in the Western media reports on Macedonia’s referendum is a very and fundamental fact that 36% of the active voters were, in fact, predominantly ethnic Albanians while ethnic Macedonians boycotted it. This fact once again opened an Albanian Pandora box in Macedonia forcing domestic politicians and political analysts to start rethinking about Albanian-Macedonian relations after the dissolution of Yugoslavia. However, those relations were quite unpleasant and from many aspects directly linked with the destiny of Albanians in Kosovo. Every expert in current Macedonian political problems knows well that Macedonia’s Albanians, living in compact masses in the western part of the country, never felt Macedonia as their motherland but rather struggling for the territorial separation from the rest of Macedonia and even seeking the unification with a real motherland – (a Greater) Albania. It is as well as known that the inter Albanian-Macedonian conflicts, including and the Albanian military revolts, started from the very beginning of Macedonia’s proclamation of the independence and the adoption of a new Constitution in 1991. Subsequently, for the Western “math-gangsters” it is not going to be of any difficulty to fuel another war in the Balkans – in Macedonia.

As a matter of fact, it passed three years and a half after the last open armed conflict that was based on the interethnic Albanian-Slavic relations in Macedonia (in May 2015). However, it was just an expected continuation of constant tensions between the ethnic Albanians and the Macedonian Slavs during the last quarter of the century.[1] However, these tensions are time to time transformed into the open armed conflicts of the Albanian extremists, usually coming from Kosovo, with the Macedonian security forces. The most notable conflict incident in Macedonia after the Kosovo War in 1998−1999, when the Kosovo Albanians started to export the Kosovo revolution to neighboring Macedonia is recorded in 2001. The conflict was ended by the EU/USA sponsored the Ohrid Framework Agreement that was signed on August 13th, 2001 in the favor of Macedonia’s Albanians, but a new conflict erupted in 2007 when on November 7th, the Macedonian special police forces liquidated six armed Albanians who came from neighboring Kosovo on the Shara Mt. in North Macedonia – the region known from 1991 as the most nationalistic and separatist Albanian area at the Balkans after Kosovo. A similar conflict occurred in the next year after the parliamentary elections in June just on a smaller scale of the violence. Nevertheless, in the 2007 case, for instance, police found a large number of hidden arms and ammunition on one location at the Shara Mt. (brought from Kosovo). Undoubtedly, many Balkan political analytics are kin to confirm that what is happening in Macedonia after 1999 is the export of the Western-sponsored Kosovo revolution from 1998−1999 what basically means that Macedonia is scheduled by the Kosovo Albanian “revolutionaries” (i.e., by the political leadership of the Kosovo Liberation Army−the KLA) to be the next Balkan country which will experience a “Kosovo syndrome” that was successfully finished by the proclamation of the Kosovo independence in February 2008. It is as well as assumed that Montenegro is already the third Balkan country that is directly infected by the process of Kosovization.

The pre-1991 “Macedonian Question”

Macedonia always was on the crossroads of the Balkans having one of the vital strategic positions at the peninsula. The geostrategic importance of Macedonia was probably expressed on the best way by the German PM (kanzellar) Otto von Bismarck: “Those who control the valley of the Vardar River are the masters of the Balkans”.[2]

A whole historic-geographic territory of Macedonia was formerly part of the Ottoman Empire from 1371 to 1912. Macedonia was the first Yugoslav land to be occupied by the Ottomans and the last one to be liberated from the Ottoman yoke. Before the Ottoman lordship, Macedonia was governed by the Byzantine Empire, Bulgaria, and Serbia. A Bulgarian sponsored the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (the IMRO) was established in 1893 in Thessaloniki with the ultimate political goal to include whole Macedonia into Bulgaria. After the Balkan Wars of 1912−1913, a territory of historic-geographic Macedonia was partitioned between Serbia, Greece, and Bulgaria. During the WWI Macedonia became a scene of fierce fighting between the Central Powers and the Entente (the Macedonian front). Allied forces landed at Thessaloniki in October 1915 to be soon accompanied with approximately 150.000 Serbian soldiers who escaped from occupied Serbia. In September 1918 under the French General Franchet d’Esperey, a joint British, French and Serbian army advanced against Bulgaria and soon liberated Serbia.[3]

After the WWI, the Treaty of Neuilly confirmed Vardar Macedonia as a part of the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, while Aegean Macedonia with Thessaloniki remained the Greek and Pirin Macedonia the Bulgarian. In the 1920s, a large population movement transformed the ethnic composition of the population of historic-geographic Macedonia. The crucial exchange of population occurred after the Treaty of Lausanne as some 350.000 Muslims from Macedonia were exchanged with Turkey by at least 1.200.000 ethnic Greeks from Anatolia. In the interwar time, a Bulgarian sponsored the IMRO terrorism activity increased in the Yugoslav Macedonia seeking to destabilize the country in order to finally annex Macedonia into Bulgaria.[4] After 1945, Vardar Macedonia became a socialist republic within the Yugoslav federation with recognized a separate Macedonian nationality, Macedonian language, and alphabet which was standardized for the first time in history in socialist Yugoslavia. Up to 1991, the Yugoslav authorities fostered a Macedonian self-identity and nationalism at the expense of both the Serb and Bulgarian national interests.[5] Therefore, for the very reason to keep a territorial integrity of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia, its Albanian minority was not granted a status of an autonomous province as it was the case with Kosovo’s Albanians in Serbia who had, according to the last Yugoslav Constitution (1974), their own President, Constitution, Government, Assembly, police forces, the provincial defense system,  the University of Prishtina, and finally, the Kosovo’s Academy of Sciences – a state within the state.

The post-1991 “Macedonian Question”

During the violent destruction of ex-Yugoslavia, in November 1991 the Socialist Republic of Macedonia proclaimed independence that was first recognized by Bulgaria. However, Bulgaria never recognized a separate Macedonian language and ethnicity as for the Bulgarians all Macedonian Slavs are the ethnolinguistic Bulgarians.[6] Of course, when Skopje decided to declare independence the Macedonians decided at the same time to deal alone with the Albanian nationalism and separatism in Macedonia without the help by the Serbs. The central Government in Skopje believed at that time that the West will protect a territorial integrity of Macedonia and, therefore, yet in 1991 the NATO’s troops were invited to be deployed in this newly proclaimed independent state which became internationally recognized in 1993 but with a provisional state’s name of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (the FYROM) – a unique case in the world history. Nevertheless, a new Macedonian Constitution, a constitutional state’s name (the Republic of Macedonia) and the state’s symbols created immediately extremely tense and hostile relationships with a neighboring Greece as Skopje developed the rival (and, in fact, unjust) claims to the ethnohistorical heritage of the ancient Macedonians and the Kingdom of Macedon of Philip II and Alexander the Great.[7] Greece and the FYROM recognized each other five years after the Macedonian official proclamation of independence when Greece lifted economic blockade against the FYROM as a consequence of the deal.

However, the crucial challenge to the post-1991 “Macedonian Question” is coming from the ethnic breakdown of the country and the historical background of interethnic relations between the Macedonian Slavs and the Macedonian Albanians. The latter are the biggest and most nationalistic ethnic minority in the FYROM composing today about 30% of the total population. Their number increased during the Kosovo War in 1998−1999, especially during the NATO’s “a prominent example of unauthorized humanitarian intervention”[8] against Serbia and Montenegro, as the Kosovo Albanians, formally as the refugees, came to Macedonia followed by their compatriots from Albania – a country out of any warfare at that time. A majority of those Albanian “refugees”[9], in fact, never returned back to their homeland. Interethnic tensions between the Macedonian Slavs and the Macedonian Albanians soon became increased due to both worsening economic situation and the uncompromised Albanian nationalism as an effect of the exported the “Kosovo syndrome”.

The “Kosovo syndrome”

The export of the Kosovo revolution after 1999 as a direct outcome of the “Kosovo syndrome” to neighboring Macedonia is in direct connection with the much serious regional problem of the creation of a Greater Albania from 1878 up today. After June 1999 when the NATO’s troops occupied and divided Kosovo into five occupation zones, transforming this region into their colony,[10] West Macedonia became a stronghold for the rebel Albanian terrorist forces which, in fact, came from Kosovo. The Macedonian Albanian separatism backed by the KLA’s paramilitary troops in the area of Tetovo, Kumanovo and Gostivar in North-West Macedonia became directly encouraged by the fact that neighboring Kosovo’s Albanians finally succeeded to separate Kosovo from the rest of Serbia with a direct NATO’s and EU’s military, political and diplomatic support. The same or very similar scenario was drawn now and for West Macedonia with Skopje as a capital of the Albanian independent state of the Republic of Ilirida – a state already proclaimed by the local Albanian nationalists twice after the destruction of ex-Yugoslavia: in 1992 and in September 2014. Of course, an ultimate goal is a pan-Albanian unification with Tirana as a capital of a Greater Albania as it was during the WWII. Here it has to be stressed that between Kosovo, West Macedonia, and Albania, in fact, there is no successful cross-border checking system as it is “controlled” by the Albanians themselves. Therefore, in practice, a Greater Albania already exists. Furthermore, the traffic connections between Tirana and Prishtina are planned to be radically improved as Kosovo’s Albanian Government agreed with the Government of Albania to connect their two capitals with a modern highway probably financially sponsored by the EU’s tax-payers.

It is clear that according to the strategy of the creation of a Greater Albania, the Albanian-populated territories of the FYROM between Albania’s border and the Vardar River are scheduled to be next regions to follow the case of Kosovo’s separation. The original tactic by the Albanian nationalist to separate the western portion of the FYROM from 1999 to 2001 was to struggle for the territorial-national autonomy within Macedonia with the obvious purpose to finally separate it from the rest of the country as they already did it with Kosovo. As a first institution to be established for the purpose to create such territorial-national autonomy was projected to be the University of Tetovo as an ideological spring of an independent Republic of Ilirida in the town that is designed to be its capital. The same role of territorial separatism played in Serbia the University of Prishtina – the university established by the Communist authorities to be exactly the ideological-nationalistic source of the Albanian separatism in Kosovo.

Just for the very political reasons, Macedonia’s Albanians formally accepted a concept of a multicultural society (the 2001 Ohrid Framework Agreement) but in practice they as the Muslims fight for the division of the society according to the ethnic-confessional lines and the transformation of self-proclaimed their “territory” into the Islamic Illiridastan according to the pattern of the creation of Kosovostan after June 1999.[11] No doubt that both of Illiridastan and Kosovostan finally have to become the integral parts of a Greater Albania(stan) founded on the Islamic law and tradition according to the First Prizren League’s concept from 1878. The policy of ethnic and confessional separation in the FYROM is probably most visible in the case of country’s capital Skopje which is strictly divided on the Christian Macedonian (Slavonic) and Muslim Albanian parts. Macedonia’s Albanians being influenced by “Kosovo syndrome” are silently committing a policy of ethnic homogenization in West Macedonia, especially near the borders with Albania. Their claims of the pure propaganda nature that there are already up to 40% ethnic Albanians in the FYROM has as its political aim to obtain a constitutional status for the Albanians followed by a proclamation of the Albanian language as one of two state’s languages (like bilingual Belgium). However, according to the official 1994 census under the international observation control, there were 442.914 ethnic Albanians (22.9%) out of a total FYROM’s population that was at that time 1.936.877.[12]

A Greater Albania in 1944

Perspectives

The “Macedonian Question” has always been at the heart of the Balkan politics and of high interest of the Great Powers. Macedonia – the small, landlocked territory at South Balkans has been contested during the last 150 years by all its four neighbors – Serbia, Bulgaria, Albania, and Greece. A Socialist Yugoslavia of Josip Broz Tito claimed to have solved the “Macedonian Question” by the establishment of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia as a part of the Yugoslav Federation from 1945 to 1991. Nonetheless, the destruction of second Yugoslavia in 1991 reopened the issue of the future of the territory of the Vardar Macedonia – a Serbian-Yugoslav part of a geographic-historic Macedonia given to the Kingdom of Serbia by the Bucharest Peace Treaty on August 10th, 1913.[13] A successor the “Republic of Macedonia” has been proclaimed as an independent state in November 1991 but it did not receive an immediate universal international recognition either of its formal political independence or of its state’s flag and state’s name due to the obstruction by Greece.

Basically, after 1991 up today there are three main problems in regard to the “Macedonian Question”:

  1. Will Macedonian state’s territory be divided between the Slavic Macedonians and the ethnic Albanians (who are in reality probably up to 30% of Macedonia’s population)?;
  2. Will all members of international community recognize the name of the “Republic of Macedonia” (according to the Macedonian Constitution of 1991) or they will continue to call this country as it is today officially named by the UNO – the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (the FYROM); and
  3. Will the FYROM has territorial pretensions on other parts of a geographic-historic Macedonia included into Greece (the “Aegean Macedonia”) and Bulgaria (the “Pirin Macedonia”) after the Second Balkan War in 1913?

The Macedonian independence from 1991 created an extremely tense relationship with the Greek Government since Macedonia developed rival claims for ethnicity and statehood. This rivalry was epitomized in a dispute about the state’s name, as Greece objected to the use of “Macedonia”, whose historical heritage it claimed. These two countries eventually recognized each other in 1995, and the Greek economic blockade against Macedonia was lifted. The destiny of a current deal between Skopje and Athens on the state-name of the FYROM (the “North Macedonia”) is extremely obscure and uncertain due to the very fact that FYROM’s Slavic Macedonians and overwhelming majority of Greece’s citizens are, in fact, opposing the deal for their own different political, historical and cultural reasons. Therefore, the deal is only supported by the corrupted Governments of both the FYROM and Greece but having a full political support by the Western “math-gangsters” who are going to re-activate “Kosovo syndrome” in Macedonia in order to pack the country into both the NATO and the EU with a fundamental help by Macedonia’s ethnic Albanians who will, as a matter of compensation, receive either a separate national-political territory (state within a state) or even a quasi-independence according to Kosovo’s pattern.

Nevertheless, the crucial problem in this country is that the ethnic makeup of the FYROM continued to change as the Albanian refugees poured in from Kosovo and Albania increasing the size of the Albanian minority, de facto, to 30%. Tensions were increased through the worsening economic situation, which escalated as a result of international sanctions and the war against its main trading partner – ex-Yugoslavia. As the situation in Kosovo escalated and war erupted in 1998−1999, Macedonia became an important stronghold for the moderate Albanian opposition from Kosovo, but also for the rebel Kosovo’s Liberation Army (the KLA). Extremely encouraged by the recognition of the Albanian required rights in Kosovo from June 1999 by the West, the Albanian minority in West Macedonia became more assertive and politically aggressive, in fact, politically terrorizing a central Government in Skopje especially after the Ohrid Framework Agreement was signed in 2001. Following violent clashes in 2001 between the Macedonian police forces and the (Kosovo’s) Albanian rebels, the NATO followed the plea of the pro-Western Macedonian Government and increased its presence in this South Balkan country. A higher scale of a civil war was narrowly avoided in 2001 when the Macedonian Parliament in Skopje agreed but under the direct Western (the EU/USA) pressure and blackmailing, great concessions granting linguistic and limited political autonomy to the Albanian minority in Macedonia. In return, the KLA’s rebels in Macedonia (under the official name of the Albanian National Army – the ANA) agreed to give up their arms to the NATO’s troops – a gesture that was done more for the TV screens as the main guns’ arsenal of the KLA was returned back to Kosovo to be re-activated in Macedonia once again on May 9−10th,  2015 regardless on the presence of the NATO’s peace-keeping troops in Macedonia which arrived there already in the early 1990s following the plea of the Macedonian Government after the violent clashes between Macedonia’s police and the Albanian rebels.

Conclusions

The “Macedonian Question” after the 2001 KLA’s rebellion in Macedonia primarily was depending on solving the “Kosovo Question”. In the other words, it was logically expected that in the case of “international” (i.e., the Western) recognition of Kosovo self-proclaimed and by the West sponsored quasi-independence after February 17th, 2008 the Albanians from the West FYROM (likely followed by their compatriots from the East Montenegro) will follow a Kosovo’s example of regional revolution for the sake of getting territorial-national independence with a final aim to join a Greater Albania as it was clearly noticed even in 1997 by at that time Kosovo’s Albanian leader (later on the “President” of Kosovo) Dr. Ibrahim Rugova and confirmed by Albania’s PM, Edi Rama in May 2015. Now we are in the process of practical realization of a Greater Albania project that was designed for the first time by the Muslim pro-Albanian First Prizren League in 1878. Or better to say, we are today dealing with the revival of a Greater Albania created by Mussolini in 1941 – a real state that existed until the end of the WWII. A difference is only that the WWII Greater Albania was sponsored by the Western Nazi-fascism while a present-day Greater Albania is backed by the Western self-proclaimed liberal democracies.

Any Macedonia’s move towards the friendly relations with Russia is immediately obstructed and punished by Macedonia’s colonial masters – the EU/NATO. For instance, Macedonia’s Government of Nikola Gruevski (PM from 2006 and a leader of the VMRO-DPMNE) was punished in May 2015 by the US-led NATO’s World Order by re-activating the NATO’s sponsored and protected KLA in Macedonia for two reasons:

  1. A Macedonian policy not to introduce sanctions against Russia.
  2. A Macedonian wish to join Russia’s sponsored the “Turkish Stream” of supplying Europe with the Siberian gas.

Nevertheless, the re-activation of the KLA’s fighters from Kosovo in the area of Kumanovo in the FYROM in 2015 had and its “Greek” dimension. As at that time a Greek Government was becoming more closer to Russia the policy of Kosovization of Macedonia was properly used and against Greece as an instrument of punishing the Greek pro-Russian policy. Namely, a summer holiday tourism is for Greece one of the most important incomes for the national budget per year. As a huge number of the European tourists are coming to Greece by the highway that is crossing Serbia, Macedonia and exactly the Kumanovo area it was quite expectable that in the case of the conflicting political-military situation in the FYROM the European tourists will simply quit an idea to visit Greece taking into the account two fundamental reasons:

  1. They have to cross the conflicting area in Macedonia.
  2. The conflict in Macedonia can spill over to Greece itself and most probably to Serbia – a country also on their road to Greece.

Finally, the armed KLA’s rebellion in May 2015 against the state of Macedonia was used only as a pretext for the realization of the final political aim in this Balkan country: to change the Government in Skopje by the colored revolution like in Belgrade in October 2000. Similarly to Serbia after October 2000, a new post-revolution Macedonian Government was expected by its Western sponsors to transform Macedonia into another client state of the post-Cold War NATO’s World Order. In other words, a current political post-referendum stalemate in Macedonia can be tried to be solved by the Western “math-gangsters” according to already applied and workable recipe of the Kosovization with the regional ethnic Albanians as the main actors. However, if this scenario is going to be realized can depend and on another player in the Balkan affairs – Russia by using a Syrian recipe of beating the Western “math-gangsters”.[14]

Skopje, the FYROM

Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirović

www.global-politics.eu/sotirovic

sotirovic@global-politics.eu

© Vladislav B. Sotirović 2018

Endnotes:

[1] On this issue, see [L. Danforth, The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World, Princeton, 1995].

[2] M. Glenny, The Balkans: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, 1804−1999, New York: Viking, 1999, 156.

[3] On the Macedonian front, see [G. W. Price, The Story of the Salonika Army, London 1918].

[4] On the terrorism by IMRO, see [A. Londres, Terror in the Balkans, London, 1935].

[5] On this issue, see [S. E. Palmer, R. King, Yugoslav Communism and the Macedonian Question, Connecticut, 1971].

[6] On the question of the ethnic background of the Macedonians, see [H. N. Brailsford, Macedonia – Its Races and Their Future, London, 1906; H. Poulton, Who Are the Macedonians?, London, 1995]. On the Bulgarian standpoint, see [Macedonia: Documents and Material, Sofia, 1974].

[7] On the Greek point of view, see [N. K. Martis, The Falsification of Macedonian History, Athens, 1984]. The fact is that the ancient “Macedonians were located between the Thracians and the Greeks, inhabiting the fertile plains drained by the Vardar and Struma rivers. From antiquity to the present the question has been debated as to whether these early Macedonians were Greeks or barbarians” [L. S. Stavrianos, The Balkans since 1453, New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc., 1958, 18]. However, the Macedonian kings and aristocracy have been the Greeks in language, culture, and outlook who were inviting the Greeks of learning from the Greek world to their courts. On the Macedonian point of view, see [S. Konechni, V. Georgieva, Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Macedonia, Skopje, 1998].

[8] J. L. Holzgrefe, R. O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge−New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1. On the legal aspect of the humanitarian intervention, see [Ch. Gray, International Law and the Use of Force. Fully Updated Second Edition, Oxford−New York, Oxford University Press, 2004].

[9] Majority of the Kosovo Albanian “refugees” during the Kosovo War 1998−1999 were not real refugees as they left their homes under the agreement with the KLA in order to show to the mainstream western mass media how the Serbian Government is oppressive against the Kosovo ethnic Albanians.

[10] H. Hofbauer, Eksperiment Kosovo: Povratak kolonijalizma, Beograd: Albatros Plus, 2009.

[11] On the Islamization of Kosovo, see [http://global-politics.eu/kosovostan].

[12] Д. Т. Батаковић, Косово и Метохија: Историја и идеологија, Друго допуњено издање, Београд: Чигоја штампа, 2007, 198.

[13] В. Ћоровић, Наше победе, Београд: Култура, 1990, 82.

[14] On the NATO, Balkans, and Russia after 1991, see [V. B. Sotirović, “The NATO’s World Order, the Balkans and the Russian National Interest”, International Journal of Politics & Law Research, Vol. 3, № 1, Sciknow Publications Ltd., New York, NY, 2015]


Origins of images: Facebook, Twitter, Wikimedia, Wikipedia, Flickr, Google, Imageinjection & Pinterest.

Read our Disclaimer/Legal Statement!

Donate to Support Us

We would like to ask you to consider a small donation to help our team keep working. We accept no advertising and rely only on you, our readers, to keep us digging the truth on history, global politics and international relations.

[wpedon id=”4696″ align=”left”]

Macedonian Prime Minister Zoran Zaev (C) gathers with citizens and government officials to march for European Macedonia in the center of Skopje, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 16 September 2018. The march is in support of the referendum scheduled for 30 September following the Prespa name agreement between Greece and FYROM (Macedonia). EPA-EFE/NAKE BATEV.

 
READ MORE!
Impeachment in American Political System
What is impeachment?Linguistically, the noun impeachment is a synonym for charging and it comes from the verb to impeach meaning to charge someone. In political science, the verb to impeach has two meanings: Formerly, to charge a person with treason or other very serious crime against the state or/and nation before the Parliament or National Assembly. Contemporary, to charge head of state (the President or similar) or minister with treason or with crimes against the state.As a noun with political meaning, impeachment means the charging of treason or other very serious crime which is brought against a head of state ...
READ MORE
America Celebrates Memorial Day
Wednesday, May 30th, was Memorial Day in the United States. The commemoration began in 1868 shortly after the American Civil War, when townsmen in several communities came together to decorate the graves of the fallen on the last Monday in May. The practice began in the northern states but soon spread to the south and the annual remembrance ceremony soon took on the name Decoration Day. As wars proliferated in the twentieth century the commemoration eventually lost its association with the Civil War and was increasingly referred to nationally as Memorial Day, eventually becoming a federal holiday. The American Civil war ...
READ MORE
Croatian President Lauds Ustasha Nazis as the «Fourth Reich Lite» Rears its Ugly Head in Europe
Croatia's President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic with Croatian diaspora in Canada holding the flag of WWII Nazi-Ustashi Independent State of CroatiaCroatia’s president, the former deputy NATO secretary general for public diplomacy Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic, decided to pay homage to Nazis of the Ustasha Nazi puppet regime of Croatia shot by Yugoslav partisans at the end of World War II. Grabar-Kitarovic’s tone deafness in choosing Victory in Europe week to honor dead Nazis shocked the Balkans and the rest of Europe.The Ustasha, along with their Slovenian and Serb loyalists to the Nazi puppet regime, were killed by the partisans under the command of anti-fascist ...
READ MORE
Operation Barbarossa: The 75th Anniversary of the Nazi Invasion of the Soviet Union
Seventy-five years ago Adolf Hitler launched the biggest and most destructive military campaign in history when three million German and allied troops invaded the Soviet Union along a 1,000-mile front.Operation Barbarossa – the codename for the German invasion of Russia - was no ordinary military campaign: it was an ideological and racist war, a war of destruction and extermination that aimed to kill Jews, enslave the Slavic peoples and destroy communism. The result was a war in which 25 million Soviet citizens died, including a million Jews, executed by the SS in 1941-1942 – an action which became the template ...
READ MORE
The Origin of the Nazi Salutes
Origins of images: Facebook, Twitter, Wikimedia, Wikipedia, Flickr, Google, Imageinjection, Public Domain & Pinterest.Read our Disclaimer/Legal Statement!Donate to Support UsWe would like to ask you to consider a small donation to help our team keep working. We accept no advertising and rely only on you, our readers, to keep us digging the truth on history, global politics and international relations.[wpedon id="4696" align="left"]SaveSave
READ MORE
The Story of Charlottesville was Written in Blood in Ukraine
“While I recognize the danger of the violent right-wing movement, I am more concerned with the right-wing policies that are being enacted into law and policy by both Democrats and Republicans.”What is the character of racist right-wing politics today? Is it the crazed white supremacist who plows into an anti-fascist demonstration in Charlottesville, Virginia, or can it also be the assurance by Lindsay Graham that an attack against North Korea would result in thousands of lives lost…. but those lives will be “over there”? What about the recent unanimous resolution by both Houses of Congress in support of Israel and ...
READ MORE
The Balkan Vlachs (3)
The Vlachs in Greece Many researchers and scholars judge that the largest part of the Balkan Vlachs is concentrated in Greece. The census of 1935 recorded 19,703 Vlachs in Greece, but according to the last census in Greece that allowed people to express their ethnic identity (in 1951), there were 39,855 Vlachs in this state.[1] However, a real number of the Vlachs in Greece today is up to 120,000.[2] The Vlachs in a post-war Greece are not acknowledged as an ethnic or national group for the very reason that Greece from the mid-1950s does not recognize an existence of any national or ...
READ MORE
Another Dangerous Rush to Judgment in Syria
Exclusive: The U.S. government and the mainstream media rushed to judgment again, blaming the Syrian government for a new poison-gas attack and ignoring other possibilities, reports Robert Parry. With the latest hasty judgment about Tuesday’s poison-gas deaths in a rebel-held area of northern Syria, the mainstream U.S. news media once more reveals itself to be a threat to responsible journalism and to the future of humanity. Again, we see the troubling pattern of verdict first, investigation later, even when that behavior can lead to a dangerous war escalation and many more deaths. Before a careful evaluation of the evidence about Tuesday’s tragedy ...
READ MORE
NATO’s Illegal War Against Serbia
Facts And Truth @ YouTube: “Remember why NATO spent 78-days bombing Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999? There was the ethnic cleansing. The atrocities. The refugees chased out of Kosovo by the Serb army. The mass graves. The heaps of bodies tossed into vats of sulphuric acid at the Trepca mines. NATO spokesman Jamie Shea said there were 100,000 Kosovo Albanian Muslims unaccounted for. Problem is, none of it happened.” Forensic report throws doubt on US/NATO claims of Racak “massacre” By Richard Tyler wsws.org, 12 February 2001 A forthcoming article by three Finnish pathologists throws further doubts upon official descriptions of a “massacre” in ...
READ MORE
Jasenovac – the Glossed Over Auschwitz of the Balkans
Unfathomable as that may appear, yes, it was quite possible for the second-ranking slaughterhouse in Europe in recent memory to have slipped off the radar screen. Even such a renowned authority as Professor Gideon Greif is having an exceptionally difficult time of it in trying to put it back on.Precisely because it has not been the theme of any Hollywood spectaculars, Jasenovac does not attract any school excursions and textbooks are largely silent about it. Some background information on Jasenovac therefore seems like a good place to start.The Jasenovac death camp (1941 – 1945) is inextricably bound up with the ...
READ MORE
Trump’s Win wasn’t Ideological?
CNN explained well “5 surprising lessons from Trump’s astonishing win”, and the historic crushing failure of traditional Presidential-year American politics, but it really boils down to one simple fact: In the battleground states, where most of the advertising dollars and get-out-the-vote money was being spent, the Trump organization made use of the Republican-Party organization in those portions of the campaign-operation that benefited from those established contacts and its tried-and-tested methods and techniques, but not in the portions of the campaign-operation that needed to be improved and to function better than in all prior U.S. Presidential elections. The simple fact is that ...
READ MORE
Why is NATO in Yugoslavia?
Editor’s NoteThis paper was presented by the late Sean Gervasi at the Conference on the Enlargement of NATO in Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean, Prague, 13-14 January 1996. It was published on Global Research when the Global Research website was launched on September 9, 2001. The late Sean Gervasi had tremendous foresight. He understood the process of NATO enlargement several years before it actually unfolded into a formidable military force.  He had also predicted the breakup of Yugoslavia as part of a US-NATO project.See also Sean Gervasi’s 1993 video interviewIntroductionThe North Atlantic Treaty Organization has recently sent a large task ...
READ MORE
Viktor Orban Takes Battle Against Billionaire George Soros to Next Level
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban upped the ante in his political fight against George Soros, the mega-rich financier and philanthropist who reportedly just ploughed $18 billion into his “Open Society” foundation, the controversial NGO that is seldom shy about manipulating domestic policy in Western capitals.Last week, Orban commented in an interview with Kossuth Radio that he has instructed his intelligence agencies to expose Soros-backed initiatives, which include opening up EU borders to mass migration, and the Hungarian nationals who support them both in Budapest and in Brussels.“By employing the national security services, the Soros network that strives to influence European ...
READ MORE
FYROM Should be Named Paionia as it was 2,500 Years Ago
The name of the modern land-locked country north of Greece, with its capital at Skopje, has returned to the news. It is officially called FYROM, but embedded in that name is “Macedonia” which is a reflection of the longstanding attempt to take over the modern Greek province of Macedonia as reflected in maps used in many places, including schools.It is clear that this naming implies territorial ambitions which have long been understood (http://macedonia-evidence.org/documentation.html). If that threat to the stability of the southern Balkans is to be stopped permanently, I suggest that the following must happen:1) the country should be named ...
READ MORE
Anglo-Saxon Roots of German Nazism
More than six decades after Berlin’s capitulation which capped World War II, the war is still raging, now in the form of revisionist attempts to cast a shadow over the memory of Soviet soldiers who fought in it. Among other things, the efforts aimed at equating fascism – a monster nurtured by the West in the 1930s-1940s – and Russia’s XX century wartime past are supposed to divert attention from the continuity between the Anglo-Saxon imperialism and the German national socialism. The nature and key traits of the continuity are exposed in “From Imperialism to Fascism: Why Hitlers’ India was ...
READ MORE
Past all Reason: The Vietnam War
Well-intentioned and artfully executed, The Vietnam War—Ken Burns and Lynn Novick’s 10-part, 18-hour-long documentary series on PBS—is not history, but rather story-telling and remembrance. Balanced, exhaustive, and relentlessly solemn, it glides along the surface of things, even when that surface is crowded with arrogance, miscalculation, deceit, and bloodletting on an epic scale.According to one promotional trailer prepared for the series, “In war there is no single truth.” Embedded within every war (as in other forms of human endeavor) are multiple truths—some of them trivial, others very important indeed. The purpose of history is to unearth and engage with those truths ...
READ MORE
Lawyers Serve Indictment on NATO Leaders for War Crimes
“This is an historic opportunity to demonstrate the even-handedness of international justice” – Michael Mandel, law professor, York University, Toronto, Canada, 1999 NATO leaders found guilty of war crimes in Yugoslavia “NATO leaders acted in open violation of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12th August 1949, and the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8th June 1977 . . .” Dr Will Podmore, The Lancet (June 26th 1999) In the District Court of Belgrade on September 22, 2000, the President of the court, Veroljub Raketic, handed down guilty verdicts against government leaders of NATO countries for ...
READ MORE
Five, Still Alive US Warmongering Presidents
Read our Disclaimer/Legal Statement! Donate to Support Us We would like to ask you to consider a small donation to help our team keep working. We accept no advertising and rely only on you, our readers, to keep us digging the truth on history, global politics and international relations. [wpedon id="4696" align="left"]
READ MORE
Pages Purged by Facebook Were on Blacklist Promoted by Washington Post
Media outlets removed by Facebook on Thursday, in a massive purge of 800 accounts and pages, had previously been targeted in a blacklist of oppositional sites promoted by the Washington Post in November 2016. The organizations censored by Facebook include The Anti-Media, with 2.1 million followers, The Free Thought Project, with 3.1 million followers, and Counter Current News, with 500,000 followers. All three of these groups had been on the blacklist. In November 2016, the Washington Post published a puff-piece on a shadowy and up to then largely unknown organization called PropOrNot, which had compiled a list of organizations it claimed were ...
READ MORE
Tsarist Russia and the Balkans: A Brief Overview
The Balkan Peninsula, together with the region of South-East Europe, historically has been one of the most important focal points of Russian foreign policy, cultural influences and attempts to spread an ideology of the Orthodox solidarity and the Slavic reciprocity.[1] These ideas are common to almost all trends of Russian public life in the past and very much today too. After Russia lost the Great Crimean War of 1853–1856 she intensified its cultural influence in the region of South-East Europe for the purposes of beating Habsburg (Roman-Catholic) rivalry and to spread an idea of the Pan-Slavism in this part of Europe.[2] ...
READ MORE
Impeachment in American Political System
America Celebrates Memorial Day
Croatian President Lauds Ustasha Nazis as the «Fourth Reich Lite» Rears its Ugly Head in Europe
Operation Barbarossa: The 75th Anniversary of the Nazi Invasion of the Soviet Union
The Origin of the Nazi Salutes
The Story of Charlottesville was Written in Blood in Ukraine
The Balkan Vlachs (3)
Another Dangerous Rush to Judgment in Syria
NATO’s Illegal War Against Serbia
Jasenovac – the Glossed Over Auschwitz of the Balkans
Trump’s Win wasn’t Ideological?
Why is NATO in Yugoslavia?
Viktor Orban Takes Battle Against Billionaire George Soros to Next Level
FYROM Should be Named Paionia as it was 2,500 Years Ago
Anglo-Saxon Roots of German Nazism
Past all Reason: The Vietnam War
Lawyers Serve Indictment on NATO Leaders for War Crimes
Five, Still Alive US Warmongering Presidents
Pages Purged by Facebook Were on Blacklist Promoted by Washington Post
Tsarist Russia and the Balkans: A Brief Overview

FOLLOW US ON OUR SOCIAL PLATFORMS
Share