The Western “Math-Gangsters” and the Kosovization of Macedonia

Hits: 658

Introduction

After the referendum’s results held in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on September 30th this year and the Western reactions on it (by the EU & NATO) it is absolutely clear that this small Balkan country is finally proven to be the Western puppet colony without its own real Government and above all the national sovereignty. To remind ourselves, the people of Macedonia were called to express their wish to change or not a state’s name into the Northern Macedonia and, therefore, its national name into the Northern Macedonians, in order to avoid further obstructions by neighboring Greece in the country’s accession to both the NATO and the EU. The deal on a new state’s and the national name was reached earlier this year by Macedonia’s and Greece’s PMs under the umbrella of Brussels but according to the Constitution, it has to be approved by the nation. Nevertheless, only Macedonia’s citizens went to the ballot boxes but not and their Greek counterparts. Of course, as in any even quasi-democratic political system, the success of the referendum requires an electoral-body’s activity of a minimum 50% plus one voter. However, a Macedonian voting activity counted only 36% of the active voters among whom 95% voted “Yes” that means two fundamental conclusions: 1) The referendum failed to be counted as a valid; and 2) The 2/3 of Macedonia’s voting body, de facto, told “No” to the deal with Greece.

A Greater Albania today

Nonetheless, the Western “liberal democracies” of the NATO’s and EU’s Governmental structures immediately after the referendum’s results became known expressed their deep and sincere thanks to the Macedonian people for the support of Macedonia’s way to those two Western organizations. Simply, according to their democratic miracle-arithmetic, 1/3 (of voters) is higher than 2/3 (of voters)! But such political mathematics is quite understandable if we know that Macedonia simply has to become the NATO/EU’s member state by all means – regular or not no matter. On this place we have to keep in mind three crucial facts: 1) Macedonia, together with a neighboring Kosovo, has the focal geopolitical position at the Balkans; 2) The whole region is left to be an exclusive Western (the EU/NATO/USA) colonial territory or a “sphere of interest” since 2003 when the Russian peacekeepers left the region; and ) Macedonia is even from 1991 under a direct protectorate by the NATO troops just in the formal form of the UN protection forces. But at the same time, the question is what the Western “math-gangsters” are going to do in order to force 2/3 of Macedonia’s population to accept a name-deal with Greece? The answer is simple, workable, productive and already implemented two decades ago in the case of neighboring Serbia – the Kosovization of Macedonia. In other words, the Western “math-gangsters” will re-activate in a pure form a Kosovo syndrome in Macedonia in order to necessitate “Russian agents” to accept the name-deal for the sake of NATO/EU’s membership. The same happened with Serbia in 1998−1999: when Slobodan Miloshevic rejected the American ultimatum to transform Serbia into the Western political, financial, economic and military colony, immediately Kosovo’s Albanians were activated and the war with Serbia’s state’s authorities started. The end of Kosovization of Serbia is already well known.

An Albanian factor

What is really missing in the Western media reports on Macedonia’s referendum is a very and fundamental fact that 36% of the active voters were, in fact, predominantly ethnic Albanians while ethnic Macedonians boycotted it. This fact once again opened an Albanian Pandora box in Macedonia forcing domestic politicians and political analysts to start rethinking about Albanian-Macedonian relations after the dissolution of Yugoslavia. However, those relations were quite unpleasant and from many aspects directly linked with the destiny of Albanians in Kosovo. Every expert in current Macedonian political problems knows well that Macedonia’s Albanians, living in compact masses in the western part of the country, never felt Macedonia as their motherland but rather struggling for the territorial separation from the rest of Macedonia and even seeking the unification with a real motherland – (a Greater) Albania. It is as well as known that the inter Albanian-Macedonian conflicts, including and the Albanian military revolts, started from the very beginning of Macedonia’s proclamation of the independence and the adoption of a new Constitution in 1991. Subsequently, for the Western “math-gangsters” it is not going to be of any difficulty to fuel another war in the Balkans – in Macedonia.

As a matter of fact, it passed three years and a half after the last open armed conflict that was based on the interethnic Albanian-Slavic relations in Macedonia (in May 2015). However, it was just an expected continuation of constant tensions between the ethnic Albanians and the Macedonian Slavs during the last quarter of the century.[1] However, these tensions are time to time transformed into the open armed conflicts of the Albanian extremists, usually coming from Kosovo, with the Macedonian security forces. The most notable conflict incident in Macedonia after the Kosovo War in 1998−1999, when the Kosovo Albanians started to export the Kosovo revolution to neighboring Macedonia is recorded in 2001. The conflict was ended by the EU/USA sponsored the Ohrid Framework Agreement that was signed on August 13th, 2001 in the favor of Macedonia’s Albanians, but a new conflict erupted in 2007 when on November 7th, the Macedonian special police forces liquidated six armed Albanians who came from neighboring Kosovo on the Shara Mt. in North Macedonia – the region known from 1991 as the most nationalistic and separatist Albanian area at the Balkans after Kosovo. A similar conflict occurred in the next year after the parliamentary elections in June just on a smaller scale of the violence. Nevertheless, in the 2007 case, for instance, police found a large number of hidden arms and ammunition on one location at the Shara Mt. (brought from Kosovo). Undoubtedly, many Balkan political analytics are kin to confirm that what is happening in Macedonia after 1999 is the export of the Western-sponsored Kosovo revolution from 1998−1999 what basically means that Macedonia is scheduled by the Kosovo Albanian “revolutionaries” (i.e., by the political leadership of the Kosovo Liberation Army−the KLA) to be the next Balkan country which will experience a “Kosovo syndrome” that was successfully finished by the proclamation of the Kosovo independence in February 2008. It is as well as assumed that Montenegro is already the third Balkan country that is directly infected by the process of Kosovization.

The pre-1991 “Macedonian Question”

Macedonia always was on the crossroads of the Balkans having one of the vital strategic positions at the peninsula. The geostrategic importance of Macedonia was probably expressed on the best way by the German PM (kanzellar) Otto von Bismarck: “Those who control the valley of the Vardar River are the masters of the Balkans”.[2]

A whole historic-geographic territory of Macedonia was formerly part of the Ottoman Empire from 1371 to 1912. Macedonia was the first Yugoslav land to be occupied by the Ottomans and the last one to be liberated from the Ottoman yoke. Before the Ottoman lordship, Macedonia was governed by the Byzantine Empire, Bulgaria, and Serbia. A Bulgarian sponsored the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (the IMRO) was established in 1893 in Thessaloniki with the ultimate political goal to include whole Macedonia into Bulgaria. After the Balkan Wars of 1912−1913, a territory of historic-geographic Macedonia was partitioned between Serbia, Greece, and Bulgaria. During the WWI Macedonia became a scene of fierce fighting between the Central Powers and the Entente (the Macedonian front). Allied forces landed at Thessaloniki in October 1915 to be soon accompanied with approximately 150.000 Serbian soldiers who escaped from occupied Serbia. In September 1918 under the French General Franchet d’Esperey, a joint British, French and Serbian army advanced against Bulgaria and soon liberated Serbia.[3]

After the WWI, the Treaty of Neuilly confirmed Vardar Macedonia as a part of the Kingdom of the Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, while Aegean Macedonia with Thessaloniki remained the Greek and Pirin Macedonia the Bulgarian. In the 1920s, a large population movement transformed the ethnic composition of the population of historic-geographic Macedonia. The crucial exchange of population occurred after the Treaty of Lausanne as some 350.000 Muslims from Macedonia were exchanged with Turkey by at least 1.200.000 ethnic Greeks from Anatolia. In the interwar time, a Bulgarian sponsored the IMRO terrorism activity increased in the Yugoslav Macedonia seeking to destabilize the country in order to finally annex Macedonia into Bulgaria.[4] After 1945, Vardar Macedonia became a socialist republic within the Yugoslav federation with recognized a separate Macedonian nationality, Macedonian language, and alphabet which was standardized for the first time in history in socialist Yugoslavia. Up to 1991, the Yugoslav authorities fostered a Macedonian self-identity and nationalism at the expense of both the Serb and Bulgarian national interests.[5] Therefore, for the very reason to keep a territorial integrity of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia, its Albanian minority was not granted a status of an autonomous province as it was the case with Kosovo’s Albanians in Serbia who had, according to the last Yugoslav Constitution (1974), their own President, Constitution, Government, Assembly, police forces, the provincial defense system,  the University of Prishtina, and finally, the Kosovo’s Academy of Sciences – a state within the state.

The post-1991 “Macedonian Question”

During the violent destruction of ex-Yugoslavia, in November 1991 the Socialist Republic of Macedonia proclaimed independence that was first recognized by Bulgaria. However, Bulgaria never recognized a separate Macedonian language and ethnicity as for the Bulgarians all Macedonian Slavs are the ethnolinguistic Bulgarians.[6] Of course, when Skopje decided to declare independence the Macedonians decided at the same time to deal alone with the Albanian nationalism and separatism in Macedonia without the help by the Serbs. The central Government in Skopje believed at that time that the West will protect a territorial integrity of Macedonia and, therefore, yet in 1991 the NATO’s troops were invited to be deployed in this newly proclaimed independent state which became internationally recognized in 1993 but with a provisional state’s name of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (the FYROM) – a unique case in the world history. Nevertheless, a new Macedonian Constitution, a constitutional state’s name (the Republic of Macedonia) and the state’s symbols created immediately extremely tense and hostile relationships with a neighboring Greece as Skopje developed the rival (and, in fact, unjust) claims to the ethnohistorical heritage of the ancient Macedonians and the Kingdom of Macedon of Philip II and Alexander the Great.[7] Greece and the FYROM recognized each other five years after the Macedonian official proclamation of independence when Greece lifted economic blockade against the FYROM as a consequence of the deal.

However, the crucial challenge to the post-1991 “Macedonian Question” is coming from the ethnic breakdown of the country and the historical background of interethnic relations between the Macedonian Slavs and the Macedonian Albanians. The latter are the biggest and most nationalistic ethnic minority in the FYROM composing today about 30% of the total population. Their number increased during the Kosovo War in 1998−1999, especially during the NATO’s “a prominent example of unauthorized humanitarian intervention”[8] against Serbia and Montenegro, as the Kosovo Albanians, formally as the refugees, came to Macedonia followed by their compatriots from Albania – a country out of any warfare at that time. A majority of those Albanian “refugees”[9], in fact, never returned back to their homeland. Interethnic tensions between the Macedonian Slavs and the Macedonian Albanians soon became increased due to both worsening economic situation and the uncompromised Albanian nationalism as an effect of the exported the “Kosovo syndrome”.

The “Kosovo syndrome”

The export of the Kosovo revolution after 1999 as a direct outcome of the “Kosovo syndrome” to neighboring Macedonia is in direct connection with the much serious regional problem of the creation of a Greater Albania from 1878 up today. After June 1999 when the NATO’s troops occupied and divided Kosovo into five occupation zones, transforming this region into their colony,[10] West Macedonia became a stronghold for the rebel Albanian terrorist forces which, in fact, came from Kosovo. The Macedonian Albanian separatism backed by the KLA’s paramilitary troops in the area of Tetovo, Kumanovo and Gostivar in North-West Macedonia became directly encouraged by the fact that neighboring Kosovo’s Albanians finally succeeded to separate Kosovo from the rest of Serbia with a direct NATO’s and EU’s military, political and diplomatic support. The same or very similar scenario was drawn now and for West Macedonia with Skopje as a capital of the Albanian independent state of the Republic of Ilirida – a state already proclaimed by the local Albanian nationalists twice after the destruction of ex-Yugoslavia: in 1992 and in September 2014. Of course, an ultimate goal is a pan-Albanian unification with Tirana as a capital of a Greater Albania as it was during the WWII. Here it has to be stressed that between Kosovo, West Macedonia, and Albania, in fact, there is no successful cross-border checking system as it is “controlled” by the Albanians themselves. Therefore, in practice, a Greater Albania already exists. Furthermore, the traffic connections between Tirana and Prishtina are planned to be radically improved as Kosovo’s Albanian Government agreed with the Government of Albania to connect their two capitals with a modern highway probably financially sponsored by the EU’s tax-payers.

It is clear that according to the strategy of the creation of a Greater Albania, the Albanian-populated territories of the FYROM between Albania’s border and the Vardar River are scheduled to be next regions to follow the case of Kosovo’s separation. The original tactic by the Albanian nationalist to separate the western portion of the FYROM from 1999 to 2001 was to struggle for the territorial-national autonomy within Macedonia with the obvious purpose to finally separate it from the rest of the country as they already did it with Kosovo. As a first institution to be established for the purpose to create such territorial-national autonomy was projected to be the University of Tetovo as an ideological spring of an independent Republic of Ilirida in the town that is designed to be its capital. The same role of territorial separatism played in Serbia the University of Prishtina – the university established by the Communist authorities to be exactly the ideological-nationalistic source of the Albanian separatism in Kosovo.

Just for the very political reasons, Macedonia’s Albanians formally accepted a concept of a multicultural society (the 2001 Ohrid Framework Agreement) but in practice they as the Muslims fight for the division of the society according to the ethnic-confessional lines and the transformation of self-proclaimed their “territory” into the Islamic Illiridastan according to the pattern of the creation of Kosovostan after June 1999.[11] No doubt that both of Illiridastan and Kosovostan finally have to become the integral parts of a Greater Albania(stan) founded on the Islamic law and tradition according to the First Prizren League’s concept from 1878. The policy of ethnic and confessional separation in the FYROM is probably most visible in the case of country’s capital Skopje which is strictly divided on the Christian Macedonian (Slavonic) and Muslim Albanian parts. Macedonia’s Albanians being influenced by “Kosovo syndrome” are silently committing a policy of ethnic homogenization in West Macedonia, especially near the borders with Albania. Their claims of the pure propaganda nature that there are already up to 40% ethnic Albanians in the FYROM has as its political aim to obtain a constitutional status for the Albanians followed by a proclamation of the Albanian language as one of two state’s languages (like bilingual Belgium). However, according to the official 1994 census under the international observation control, there were 442.914 ethnic Albanians (22.9%) out of a total FYROM’s population that was at that time 1.936.877.[12]

A Greater Albania in 1944

Perspectives

The “Macedonian Question” has always been at the heart of the Balkan politics and of high interest of the Great Powers. Macedonia – the small, landlocked territory at South Balkans has been contested during the last 150 years by all its four neighbors – Serbia, Bulgaria, Albania, and Greece. A Socialist Yugoslavia of Josip Broz Tito claimed to have solved the “Macedonian Question” by the establishment of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia as a part of the Yugoslav Federation from 1945 to 1991. Nonetheless, the destruction of second Yugoslavia in 1991 reopened the issue of the future of the territory of the Vardar Macedonia – a Serbian-Yugoslav part of a geographic-historic Macedonia given to the Kingdom of Serbia by the Bucharest Peace Treaty on August 10th, 1913.[13] A successor the “Republic of Macedonia” has been proclaimed as an independent state in November 1991 but it did not receive an immediate universal international recognition either of its formal political independence or of its state’s flag and state’s name due to the obstruction by Greece.

Basically, after 1991 up today there are three main problems in regard to the “Macedonian Question”:

  1. Will Macedonian state’s territory be divided between the Slavic Macedonians and the ethnic Albanians (who are in reality probably up to 30% of Macedonia’s population)?;
  2. Will all members of international community recognize the name of the “Republic of Macedonia” (according to the Macedonian Constitution of 1991) or they will continue to call this country as it is today officially named by the UNO – the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (the FYROM); and
  3. Will the FYROM has territorial pretensions on other parts of a geographic-historic Macedonia included into Greece (the “Aegean Macedonia”) and Bulgaria (the “Pirin Macedonia”) after the Second Balkan War in 1913?

The Macedonian independence from 1991 created an extremely tense relationship with the Greek Government since Macedonia developed rival claims for ethnicity and statehood. This rivalry was epitomized in a dispute about the state’s name, as Greece objected to the use of “Macedonia”, whose historical heritage it claimed. These two countries eventually recognized each other in 1995, and the Greek economic blockade against Macedonia was lifted. The destiny of a current deal between Skopje and Athens on the state-name of the FYROM (the “North Macedonia”) is extremely obscure and uncertain due to the very fact that FYROM’s Slavic Macedonians and overwhelming majority of Greece’s citizens are, in fact, opposing the deal for their own different political, historical and cultural reasons. Therefore, the deal is only supported by the corrupted Governments of both the FYROM and Greece but having a full political support by the Western “math-gangsters” who are going to re-activate “Kosovo syndrome” in Macedonia in order to pack the country into both the NATO and the EU with a fundamental help by Macedonia’s ethnic Albanians who will, as a matter of compensation, receive either a separate national-political territory (state within a state) or even a quasi-independence according to Kosovo’s pattern.

Nevertheless, the crucial problem in this country is that the ethnic makeup of the FYROM continued to change as the Albanian refugees poured in from Kosovo and Albania increasing the size of the Albanian minority, de facto, to 30%. Tensions were increased through the worsening economic situation, which escalated as a result of international sanctions and the war against its main trading partner – ex-Yugoslavia. As the situation in Kosovo escalated and war erupted in 1998−1999, Macedonia became an important stronghold for the moderate Albanian opposition from Kosovo, but also for the rebel Kosovo’s Liberation Army (the KLA). Extremely encouraged by the recognition of the Albanian required rights in Kosovo from June 1999 by the West, the Albanian minority in West Macedonia became more assertive and politically aggressive, in fact, politically terrorizing a central Government in Skopje especially after the Ohrid Framework Agreement was signed in 2001. Following violent clashes in 2001 between the Macedonian police forces and the (Kosovo’s) Albanian rebels, the NATO followed the plea of the pro-Western Macedonian Government and increased its presence in this South Balkan country. A higher scale of a civil war was narrowly avoided in 2001 when the Macedonian Parliament in Skopje agreed but under the direct Western (the EU/USA) pressure and blackmailing, great concessions granting linguistic and limited political autonomy to the Albanian minority in Macedonia. In return, the KLA’s rebels in Macedonia (under the official name of the Albanian National Army – the ANA) agreed to give up their arms to the NATO’s troops – a gesture that was done more for the TV screens as the main guns’ arsenal of the KLA was returned back to Kosovo to be re-activated in Macedonia once again on May 9−10th,  2015 regardless on the presence of the NATO’s peace-keeping troops in Macedonia which arrived there already in the early 1990s following the plea of the Macedonian Government after the violent clashes between Macedonia’s police and the Albanian rebels.

Conclusions

The “Macedonian Question” after the 2001 KLA’s rebellion in Macedonia primarily was depending on solving the “Kosovo Question”. In the other words, it was logically expected that in the case of “international” (i.e., the Western) recognition of Kosovo self-proclaimed and by the West sponsored quasi-independence after February 17th, 2008 the Albanians from the West FYROM (likely followed by their compatriots from the East Montenegro) will follow a Kosovo’s example of regional revolution for the sake of getting territorial-national independence with a final aim to join a Greater Albania as it was clearly noticed even in 1997 by at that time Kosovo’s Albanian leader (later on the “President” of Kosovo) Dr. Ibrahim Rugova and confirmed by Albania’s PM, Edi Rama in May 2015. Now we are in the process of practical realization of a Greater Albania project that was designed for the first time by the Muslim pro-Albanian First Prizren League in 1878. Or better to say, we are today dealing with the revival of a Greater Albania created by Mussolini in 1941 – a real state that existed until the end of the WWII. A difference is only that the WWII Greater Albania was sponsored by the Western Nazi-fascism while a present-day Greater Albania is backed by the Western self-proclaimed liberal democracies.

Any Macedonia’s move towards the friendly relations with Russia is immediately obstructed and punished by Macedonia’s colonial masters – the EU/NATO. For instance, Macedonia’s Government of Nikola Gruevski (PM from 2006 and a leader of the VMRO-DPMNE) was punished in May 2015 by the US-led NATO’s World Order by re-activating the NATO’s sponsored and protected KLA in Macedonia for two reasons:

  1. A Macedonian policy not to introduce sanctions against Russia.
  2. A Macedonian wish to join Russia’s sponsored the “Turkish Stream” of supplying Europe with the Siberian gas.

Nevertheless, the re-activation of the KLA’s fighters from Kosovo in the area of Kumanovo in the FYROM in 2015 had and its “Greek” dimension. As at that time a Greek Government was becoming more closer to Russia the policy of Kosovization of Macedonia was properly used and against Greece as an instrument of punishing the Greek pro-Russian policy. Namely, a summer holiday tourism is for Greece one of the most important incomes for the national budget per year. As a huge number of the European tourists are coming to Greece by the highway that is crossing Serbia, Macedonia and exactly the Kumanovo area it was quite expectable that in the case of the conflicting political-military situation in the FYROM the European tourists will simply quit an idea to visit Greece taking into the account two fundamental reasons:

  1. They have to cross the conflicting area in Macedonia.
  2. The conflict in Macedonia can spill over to Greece itself and most probably to Serbia – a country also on their road to Greece.

Finally, the armed KLA’s rebellion in May 2015 against the state of Macedonia was used only as a pretext for the realization of the final political aim in this Balkan country: to change the Government in Skopje by the colored revolution like in Belgrade in October 2000. Similarly to Serbia after October 2000, a new post-revolution Macedonian Government was expected by its Western sponsors to transform Macedonia into another client state of the post-Cold War NATO’s World Order. In other words, a current political post-referendum stalemate in Macedonia can be tried to be solved by the Western “math-gangsters” according to already applied and workable recipe of the Kosovization with the regional ethnic Albanians as the main actors. However, if this scenario is going to be realized can depend and on another player in the Balkan affairs – Russia by using a Syrian recipe of beating the Western “math-gangsters”.[14]

Skopje, the FYROM

Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirović

www.global-politics.eu/sotirovic

sotirovic@global-politics.eu

© Vladislav B. Sotirović 2018

Endnotes:

[1] On this issue, see [L. Danforth, The Macedonian Conflict: Ethnic Nationalism in a Transnational World, Princeton, 1995].

[2] M. Glenny, The Balkans: Nationalism, War and the Great Powers, 1804−1999, New York: Viking, 1999, 156.

[3] On the Macedonian front, see [G. W. Price, The Story of the Salonika Army, London 1918].

[4] On the terrorism by IMRO, see [A. Londres, Terror in the Balkans, London, 1935].

[5] On this issue, see [S. E. Palmer, R. King, Yugoslav Communism and the Macedonian Question, Connecticut, 1971].

[6] On the question of the ethnic background of the Macedonians, see [H. N. Brailsford, Macedonia – Its Races and Their Future, London, 1906; H. Poulton, Who Are the Macedonians?, London, 1995]. On the Bulgarian standpoint, see [Macedonia: Documents and Material, Sofia, 1974].

[7] On the Greek point of view, see [N. K. Martis, The Falsification of Macedonian History, Athens, 1984]. The fact is that the ancient “Macedonians were located between the Thracians and the Greeks, inhabiting the fertile plains drained by the Vardar and Struma rivers. From antiquity to the present the question has been debated as to whether these early Macedonians were Greeks or barbarians” [L. S. Stavrianos, The Balkans since 1453, New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc., 1958, 18]. However, the Macedonian kings and aristocracy have been the Greeks in language, culture, and outlook who were inviting the Greeks of learning from the Greek world to their courts. On the Macedonian point of view, see [S. Konechni, V. Georgieva, Historical Dictionary of the Republic of Macedonia, Skopje, 1998].

[8] J. L. Holzgrefe, R. O. Keohane (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas, Cambridge−New York, Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1. On the legal aspect of the humanitarian intervention, see [Ch. Gray, International Law and the Use of Force. Fully Updated Second Edition, Oxford−New York, Oxford University Press, 2004].

[9] Majority of the Kosovo Albanian “refugees” during the Kosovo War 1998−1999 were not real refugees as they left their homes under the agreement with the KLA in order to show to the mainstream western mass media how the Serbian Government is oppressive against the Kosovo ethnic Albanians.

[10] H. Hofbauer, Eksperiment Kosovo: Povratak kolonijalizma, Beograd: Albatros Plus, 2009.

[11] On the Islamization of Kosovo, see [http://global-politics.eu/kosovostan].

[12] Д. Т. Батаковић, Косово и Метохија: Историја и идеологија, Друго допуњено издање, Београд: Чигоја штампа, 2007, 198.

[13] В. Ћоровић, Наше победе, Београд: Култура, 1990, 82.

[14] On the NATO, Balkans, and Russia after 1991, see [V. B. Sotirović, “The NATO’s World Order, the Balkans and the Russian National Interest”, International Journal of Politics & Law Research, Vol. 3, № 1, Sciknow Publications Ltd., New York, NY, 2015]


Origins of images: Facebook, Twitter, Wikimedia, Wikipedia, Flickr, Google, Imageinjection & Pinterest.

Read our Disclaimer/Legal Statement!

Donate to Support Us

We would like to ask you to consider a small donation to help our team keep working. We accept no advertising and rely only on you, our readers, to keep us digging the truth on history, global politics and international relations.

[wpedon id=”4696″ align=”left”]

Macedonian Prime Minister Zoran Zaev (C) gathers with citizens and government officials to march for European Macedonia in the center of Skopje, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 16 September 2018. The march is in support of the referendum scheduled for 30 September following the Prespa name agreement between Greece and FYROM (Macedonia). EPA-EFE/NAKE BATEV.

 
READ MORE!
U.S., U.K., & France, Certainly Committed an International War Crime against Syria on April 14th, 2018
It is now clear that on 14 April 2018, the three Governments of U.S., UK, and France, fired over a hundred missiles against Syria, on no more 'justification' than staged videos that had been done by those regimes' own proxy boots-on-the-ground fighters in Syria, who are trying to overthrow Syria's existing, non-sectarian Government and replace it by a Sharia-law regime that would be selected by agents of Saudi Arabia's ruling family. In other words: the fighters whom the U.S., UK, and France, had been arming and training, had themselves created this pretext of a faked 'gas attack' having been perpetrated ...
READ MORE
Crimea, Kosovo, Catalonia, Corsica and Kurdistan
Just three years after a citizens’ referendum returned Crimea to Russia, from which it had been separated for sixty years, the people of Catalonia, Spain’s largest province, will vote to leave that country.And just as the international community has decreed that the Crimean referendum was a fake, Spain’s Prime Minister felt compelled to declare that the vote could’t possibly take place, that it would be illegal, that independence, in his words, could only be ‘a pipe dream’ for the country’s richest province.Clearly, national governments don’t like losing land and people, however when it suits the international community, some communities are ...
READ MORE
De-Recognition of Kosovo: US Tries to Stem the Tide
The international community is accustomed to the so-called “checkbook diplomacy” that has been used by China and Taiwan to pilfer each other’s diplomatic allies by exchanging diplomatic recognition for generous financial assistance packages. However, this same battle for diplomatic recognition and de-recognition is being played out between Serbia and its breakaway province of Kosovo. The United States and much of NATO has not only granted Kosovo diplomatic recognition over the objection of Serbia but has also pressured other countries to recognize Kosovo’s independence. This process has hit a major stumbling block amid charges from various parties that fake diplomatic letters ...
READ MORE
John McCain: War Criminal, Not War Hero
“I hate the gooks,” Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) doubled down when asked on the 2000 presidential campaign trail about his continued use of the racist slur for Vietnamese people. “I will hate them as long as I live.” In the mind of the settler-colonialist, the white invader is always the victim and the people he invades, occupies, expels or exterminates are always the aggressors, going all the way back to the Native American genocide. McCain was never able to understand that in Vietnam, as in just about everywhere else they went, Americans were the invaders, not the victims. Even as McCain ...
READ MORE
The Geopolitics of Targeting Russia
The escalation of tensions between the United States, Britain and France, on the one hand, and Russia, on the other, should not surprise anyone. In the last few years, the US leadership and mainstream British media have presented Russia as a major threat to global peace and the international order. Russian president Vladimir Putin in particular has been demonised as a ‘war-monger,’ an ‘aggressor,’ an ‘unscrupulous politician’ hell-bent on restoring Russia’s past glory’ at whatever cost.This projection of Russia as a threat to world peace has intensified in recent days partly because of Putin’s unveiling of Russia’s cutting edge military ...
READ MORE
Post-Maidan Ukrainian Anti-Semitism: Tragic “Blowback” Resulting from U.S. Interventionist Foreign Policy?
The foreign policy of the United States in the post-Cold War era, driven by a doctrine of Exceptionalism and managed by a neoconservative strategy, has been responsible for the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Nato’s war on Libya in 2011 and the covert war waged in Syria using Islamist proxies. It was also at the root of its involvement in the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Ukraine in 2014. But the geopolitical advantage intended in each enterprise has brought the proverbial blowback.The results are plain to see. Libya is now certifiably a failed state. Accompanying the destruction of ...
READ MORE
Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault
According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, annexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as other countries in eastern Europe. In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pretext for Putin’s decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine. But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies share most of the ...
READ MORE
Remember the Golan Heights?
During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Syrian forces had surprised Israel and were fast approaching the edge of the steep Golan Heights, captured by Israel during the 1967 war. It seemed as if Syrian armor and infantry would retake Golan, then pour down into Israeli Galilee. Soviet recon satellites observed Israel moving its nuclear-armed, 500km-range Jericho missiles out of protective caves and onto their launch pads. At the same time, Israel was seen loading nuclear bombs on their US-supplied F-4 fighter-bombers at Tel Nof airbase. Believing Israel was about to use nuclear weapons against Syria and Egypt, Moscow put huge pressure on both ...
READ MORE
The Dirty Role of the West in Syria
September 17, 2015 “Information Clearing House” –  Over recent months the situation in the Mediterranean has served as a dramatic reminder of what the leaders of Europe have tried hard to forget. The Syrian crisis has reached Europe. Although a lot of talk has been made over numbers and percentages of refugees that every country may or may not accept, let’s not forget that behind those numbers and the showy emotionalism of the politicians hides the ugly side of world politics.The plans to overthrow the “annoying” regimes in the Middle East began at the time when the war hawks of ...
READ MORE
North Korea Threatens America. They’re Coming, They’re Going to Blow Us Up
“And you know, we have this mad guy [Kim Jong-un], I guess he’s mad, either he’s mad or he’s a genius, one or the other, but he’s actually more unstable, even than his father, …” (Donald Trump, August 2016 during election campaign) What was indelible about it [the Korean War of 1950-53] was the extraordinary destructiveness of the United States’ air campaigns against North Korea, from the widespread and continuous use of firebombing (mainly with napalm), to threats to use nuclear and chemical weapons, and the destruction of huge North Korean dams in the final stages of the war. …. (Bruce ...
READ MORE
Noel Malcolm: “Kosovo – A Short History”, 1999. A History Written With an Attempt to Support Albanian Territorial Claims in the Balkans (Fourth Part)
Ema Miljkovic-Bojanic, M. A.Institute of History ofSerbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsBelgrade, 2000Malcolm’s Apology of the “Pax Ottomana” (Ab)using of historiography and historical facts for political ends is not a novelty introduced towards the end of the twentieth century. Its instances have been known throughout history, so that “practically there is not a single epoch of human history that was not controlled – by the Church, state, nation, party, leadership…” But precisely at a time when historiography seemed to be getting rid, at least partly, of the grip of “supervision” and when a critical approach was getting the upper hand, the ...
READ MORE
Journey to Aleppo: Exposing the Truth Buried under NATO Propaganda
Aleppo has become synonymous with destruction and “Syrian state-generated” violence among those whose perception of the situation in the war-torn nation is contained within the prism of mainstream media narratives.The NATO-aligned media maintains a tight grip on information coming out of this beleaguered city, ensuring that whatever comes out is tailored to meet State Department requirements and advocacy for regime change. The propaganda mill churns out familiar tales of chemical weapons, siege, starvation, and bombs targeting civilians–all of which are attributed to the Syrian government and military, with little variation on this theme.The purpose of this photo essay and my ...
READ MORE
The Saudi Butchery in Yemen and the World’s Apathy
The cold-blooded killing of the journalist Khashoggi, however gruesome, pales compared to the brutality and gross human rights violations Saudi Arabia is committing in Yemen. The Saudis are deliberately preventing food and medicine from reaching areas where children are dying from starvation or disease. Their indiscriminate bombings are killing thousands of innocent men, women, and children, leaving whole communities in ruin. The saddest part of this unfolding tragedy is that the US and other Western powers are supplying the Saudis with the weapons they need to massacre the Yemenites, who are trapped in this proxy war between Saudi Arabia and ...
READ MORE
An Idea of the Yugoslav Unification (2)
The Slavic Congresses The idea of South Slavic political unification was surely a part of a broader pan-Slavic movement and ideology. If from nothing else, it can be proved from a very fact that the official flag of all kind of Yugoslavia (from 1918 to 2003) was, in fact, an insignia of the 19th century pan-Slavic movement, whose anthem was also used as an official state’s anthem of Socialist Yugoslavia (“Hey Slavs”). The first clear political expression of an idea of pan-Slavic reciprocity, solidarity, and possible unification was done at the First Slavic Congress held in Prague from May 5th to June ...
READ MORE
Totalitarian Rule in America
Every day signs are looming larger than life as we know it in the wealthiest nation on earth that it’s about to crash and burn, forever changing not for the better. The latest wake-up call arrived in a Guardian article earlier this week. The story features a secret prison not unlike the CIA torture detention centers all over the world whereby the Chicago police hold rounded up US citizens for hours or days at a time for interrogation. The same internationally illegal roundups of suspected “potential terrorists” (which by latest Gestapo America standards can easily be you or me) that the CIA ...
READ MORE
European Holocaust had Roots in Africa, Now Namibia is Suing Germany
In 2014, after I published my report about Namibia, exposing the German ‘semi-denial’ that it had committed a Holocaust in its former Southwest African colony; a renowned German university sent me a letter. I paraphrase here, but the essence of the letter is kept intact: “Dear Professor Vltchek, we are impressed by your research and your conclusions, and we would like to translate and publish your groundbreaking analyses in German language. Unfortunately, we cannot afford any payment…” It was one of the major universities in the country, with tremendous budgets and an international reputation. I replied, asking why, with all those scholars and ...
READ MORE
Parallels Between Israel and 1930s Germany
"Please don’t write about Ya’ir Golan!" a friend begged me, “Anything a leftist like you writes will only harm him!"So I abstained for some weeks. But I can’t keep quiet any longer.General Ya’ir Golan, the deputy Chief of Staff of the Israeli army, made a speech on Holocaust Memorial Day. Wearing his uniform, he read a prepared, well-considered text that triggered an uproar which has not yet died down.Dozens of articles have been published in its wake, some condemning him, some lauding him. Seems that nobody could stay indifferent.The main sentence was: "If there is something that frightens me about ...
READ MORE
America’s Recent Achievements in the Middle East
Here are before-and-after pictures, at https://twitter.com/MAL0mt/status/701077438525263873/photo/1, of what the U.S. government has achieved, in the Middle East:What’s especially interesting there, is that in all of these missions, except for Iraq, the U.S. was doing it with the key participation of the Saud family, the royals who own Saudi Arabia, and who are the world’s largest buyers of American weaponry. Since Barack Obama came into the White House, the operations — Libya, Yemen, and Syria — have been, to a large extent, joint operations with the Sauds. ‘We’ are now working more closely with ‘our’ ‘friends’, even than ‘we’ were under George W. Bush.As President Obama instructed his military, ...
READ MORE
Criticism of Israeli Policy is not Anti-Semitic
I was provoked to write this discussion of what is and what isn’t anti-Semitism by an article in Ha’aretz on the “controversy” created by the awarding of the 2018 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to George P. Smith. According to the reporting, Smith is not only a brilliant scientist whose work has helped lead to the creation of new drugs that can treat cancer and a range of autoimmune diseases, he is also an outspoken supporter of Palestinian rights and a critic of Israeli policies. The Ha’aretz piece notes that Smith has long been “a target of pro-Israel groups” and is listed ...
READ MORE
How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen
Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, ...
READ MORE
U.S., U.K., & France, Certainly Committed an International War Crime against Syria on April 14th, 2018
Crimea, Kosovo, Catalonia, Corsica and Kurdistan
De-Recognition of Kosovo: US Tries to Stem the Tide
John McCain: War Criminal, Not War Hero
The Geopolitics of Targeting Russia
Post-Maidan Ukrainian Anti-Semitism: Tragic “Blowback” Resulting from U.S. Interventionist Foreign Policy?
Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault
Remember the Golan Heights?
The Dirty Role of the West in Syria
North Korea Threatens America. They’re Coming, They’re Going to Blow Us Up
Noel Malcolm: “Kosovo – A Short History”, 1999. A History Written With an Attempt to Support Albanian Territorial Claims in the Balkans (Fourth Part)
Journey to Aleppo: Exposing the Truth Buried under NATO Propaganda
The Saudi Butchery in Yemen and the World’s Apathy
An Idea of the Yugoslav Unification (2)
Totalitarian Rule in America
European Holocaust had Roots in Africa, Now Namibia is Suing Germany
Parallels Between Israel and 1930s Germany
America’s Recent Achievements in the Middle East
Criticism of Israeli Policy is not Anti-Semitic
How Jimmy Carter and I Started the Mujahideen

Written by Policraticus

SHORT LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The website’s owner & editor-in-chief has no official position on any issue published at this website. The views of the authors presented at this website do not necessarily coincide with the opinion of the owner & editor-in-chief of the website. The contents of all material (articles, books, photos, videos…) are of sole responsibility of the authors. The owner & editor-in-chief of this website is not morally, scientifically or legally responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in the contents of all material found on this website. The owner & editor-in-chief of this website is not responsible for the content of external internet sites. No advertising, government or corporate funding for the functioning of this website. The owner & editor-in-chief and authors are not morally, scientifically or legally responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in the text and material found on the website www.global-politics.eu

Website: http://www.global-politics.eu